|
Public Question #4 The
following Public Question will appear on the |
|
|
|
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT
CONCERNING THE |
|
|
RIGHT TO VOTE FOR CERTAIN PERSONS |
|
|
Shall the
amendment of Article II, Section I, paragraph 6 of the Constitution, agreed
to by the Legislature, revising the |
|
YES |
current constitutional language concerning denial of the right
to
vote by deleting the phrase “idiot or insane person” and providing instead that a “person
who has been adjudicated by a court of
competent jurisdiction to lack the capacity to understand the act of voting”
shall not enjoy the right of suffrage, be adopted? |
|
|
INTERPRETIVE STATEMENT |
|
|
Approval of this amendment
concerning the denial of the right to
vote would delete the phrase “idiot or insane person” and replace that
phrase with “person who has been adjudicated
by a court of competent jurisdiction to lack the capacity to understand the act of voting” in
describing those persons who shall
be denied the right to vote. The phrase |
|
|
“idiot or insane person”
is outdated, vague, offensive to many, and may be subject to
misinterpretation. This |
|
NO |
constitutional amendment acknowledges that individuals with cognitive or
emotional disabilities may otherwise be capable of making
decisions in the voting booth and that their right of self-determination
should be respected and protected in this regard. The amendment only denies
the right of suffrage to those individuals determined by a court, on a
case-by-case basis, to lack the capacity to understand the act of voting. |
|
Anne
Milgram, Attorney General |
|